2013

(My original has many pictures and illustrations.  Please excuse this installment until I am able to complete it.)

2013         2013         2013         2013

How Japan views China and South Korea:

Those holding negative views of South Korea exceed those with positive views for the first time in the survey’s history, a dramatic and rapid reversal of previous scores. The number of Japanese who lack “affinity” for China now exceed those with positive feelings for the country by a proportion of over four-to-one. Here are the official results (the blue represents “friendly” feelings, the black line negative), and below that some thoughts on why this matters:

1/25, 2013 David Ward, a Democrat MP in Britain faces expulsion from the party for saying Jews had not learned from the murder of six million in the Holocaust in their treatment of Palestinian Authority Arabs, the Daily Mail reports.  He wrote on his own website that he was “saddened” that Jews “could within a few years of liberation from the death camps be inflicting atrocities on Palestinians…on a daily basis.”  Jon Benjamin, chief executive of the Board of Deputies of British Jews, said, “We are outraged and shocked at these offensive comments about Jewish victims of the Holocaust and the suggestion that Jews should have learned a lesson from the experience.”

1/27, 2013 Former Israeli PM Ariel Sharon showed brain activity seven years into comatose state.  Sharon, 84, led Israel from 2001 until suffering a stroke in 2006. Since then, he has been in a vegetative state, connected to a respirator.  Sharon was a storied military officer who fought in three wars before entering politics.  

1/27, 2013  Former Italian PM Silvio Berlusconi has defended the Mussolini’s decision to ally with Adolf Hitler.  "Obviously the government of that time, out of fear that German power might lead to complete victory, preferred to ally itself with Hitler's Germany rather than opposing it," he said. "As part of this alliance, there were impositions, including combating and exterminating Jews.  The racial laws were the worst fault of Mussolini as a leader, who in so many other ways did well."  Reacting to the statement, Rabbi Marvin Hier, founder of the Los Angeles-based Simon Wiesenthal Center, called it "the height of revisionism to try to reinstate an Italian dictator who helped legitimize and prop up Hitler as a 'reincarnated good guy.' "

Future Inserts:

Sun Feb 24 2013 Purim, the Jewish holiday of Revenge against Gentiles.  Israelites celebrate annual Purim with parades through Hebron or other Arab areas, past Palestinian shops and dwellings, with an effigy of Haman draped in a kaffiyeh.  Jews throughout the world label specific enemies as Haman and Christianity in general as Haman.  Other episodes of revenge throughout the year could still be connected to the spirit of Purim.

****May - Jewish-American Heritage Month

Sun Mar 16 2014 Purim, the Jewish holiday of Revenge against Gentiles.  Israelites celebrate annual Purim with parades through Hebron or other Arab areas, past Palestinian shops and dwellings, with an effigy of Haman draped in a kaffiyeh.  Jews throughout the world label specific enemies as Haman and Christianity in general as Haman.  Other episodes of revenge throughout the year could still be connected to the spirit of Purim.

****May - Jewish-American Heritage Month

Thu Mar 5 2015 Purim, the Jewish holiday of Revenge against Gentiles.  Israelites celebrate annual Purim with parades through Hebron or other Arab areas, past Palestinian shops and dwellings, with an effigy of Haman draped in a kaffiyeh.  Jews throughout the world label specific enemies as Haman and Christianity in general as Haman.  Other episodes of revenge throughout the year could still be connected to the spirit of Purim.

****May - Jewish-American Heritage Month

Will it soon be time to kick the racist Jews out?  They already have infiltrated other countries to steal those people’s resources.  In recent centuries, they were coerced out of Russia and flooded into Poland, Germany, Eastern Europe and the US.  In Germany, it was the perfect storm when these rich Jews bought up Germany’s resources through cheap money and poor Jews flooded Germany’s welfare system.  Today, in the US, they have created near bankruptcy through their frauds of the Federal Reserve and endless wars and godless materialism and multiculturalism.  Assimilated, non-Zionist or Talmudic Jews aside, they have become our Masters and are aliens in our midst.  Should we go back to the laws of the Byzantine Empire which lasted successfully from 306 to about 1204?  The Jews were “kept out of banking, out of education, and out of government.”  They could not control the economy, pervert the youth, or betray the nation.

****Final Thoughts: ****

 : Why is there not more said about the Jew Tribal Lobby?  Remember, they monopolize the Media, the Publishing world and other written word such as Critics.  If anyone says anything about the Tribe or their nation of Israel, they are immediately labeled as an anti-Semite and their career is doomed.  Even thought this author has been only a little fish in the sea, he may have also been black-balled in certain career fields for some of his (very mild) statements.  Just as Christians or Conservatives are often black-balled, just add the crazy heresy of questioning the Jews.  Most of the Lobby’s work in other fields is done by their useless-fools Gentile minions.

There’s no Business like Shoah (Holocaust) Business……..

Israel gets approximately $15 billion a year in direct and indirect aid from the American taxpayers.

The US military budget equals that of all other military budgets in the world together.  We have become an Empire, imposing US Corporate will upon the world. Rome fell of internal dissension and corruption and outside forces.  They had become an empire of ‘bread and circuses’ (welfare and diversions).  Will America last much longer?  This author believes in hope and human vitality.  We must throw off the Antichrist masters.

Palestine as an example of Jewish rule continues to be a huge concentration camp in Gaza and the West Bank.  Israel has the fourth largest military in the world.  Jews in America frame the directions of the Media.  For instance, is Israel retaliating for Arab terrorism or are Arabs fighting for their homes?  The news our Media gets about al Qaeda is from a single site from the Internet run by an Israeli.  Disinformation? You bet!

Among the many notable frauds in Holocaust scholarship is Elie Wiesel who claims to have been liberated from Auschwitz, then Buchenwald, then Dachau.  He claimed that blood spurted from the ground.  The photo that shows him in the bunks has been proved to be another man. 

 (Jewish Supremacist) Eliezer "Elie" Wiesel (9/30, 1928-  ) is a writer, professor at Boston University, political activist, Nobel Laureate and Holocaust survivor.  He is the author of 57 books, the best known of which is Night, a work based on his experiences as a prisoner in the Auschwitz and Buchenwald concentration camps.  His diverse range of other writings offer powerful and poetic contributions to literature, theology, and his own articulation of Jewish spirituality today.  Wiesel was awarded the Nobel Peace Prize in 1986.  Wiesel worked for the terrorist Irgun as a lying journalist.

 (Jewish Supremacist) fraud Simon Wiesenthal (12/31, 1908 – 9/20, 2005) was an Austrian-Jewish architectural engineer and camp survivor who became famous after World War II for his work as a Nazi hunter who pursued Nazi war criminals. [Simon Wiesenthal has lied throughout his career.]  Wiesenthal was one of 40 intellectuals from Lwow, Poland, jailed by the Nazis in July 1941.  All were incarcerated except Simon, who agreed to become an informer.  This is why Wiesenthal was transferred to five Gestapo prisons and 12 different concentration camps.  By being moved about, he could do a more thorough job of snitching.  No wonder the world class Nazi hunter refused to see the author Cezar Solodar when the latter called up Wiesenthal's Vienna office to arrange a meeting.

  This is how Simon Wiesenthal lied and how he forged the photo of German soldiers executed by the Americans, as they appeared in Life-Magazine January, 1945.  Wiesenthal published these retouched photos for his book "KZ-Mauthausen" claiming that it showed sadistically tortured and murdered concentration camp inmates. Notice the painted-in striped prison uniforms.

(Jewish Supremacists) Serge and Beate Klarsfeld-Serge (9/17, 1935, Bucharest, Romania) and Beate (2/13, 1939, Berlin, Germany) Klarsfeld are activists known for engaging in Holocaust documentation and anti-Nazi activism.  They were involved in finding Klaus Barbie, René Bousquet, Jean Leguay, Maurice Papon, and Paul Touvier to seek prosecution for their war crimes.  They have continued to harass minor functionaries.

****Professional Holocaust Survivors.  Memories change with age and motivation.  There were still a million survivors in the year 2000, a remarkable number much higher than any other nationality.  Obviously, conditions were survivable enough, unlike the conditions for German civilians and soldiers.  There have been more applicants for reparations, than ever lived in a camp.  Liars lie, especially when their religion accepts lies towards Gentiles.

Eyewitnesses- The New York Times (August 31, 1993, Science Section) reported that interesting new research explains how people "can confuse what is real and what is imagined, raising questions about witnesses' testimony and memory itself."

Not one of the leading Holocaust authors IS a historian. Raul Hilberg teaches political science. Gerald Reltlinger was an art dealer. Lucy Dawldowicz teaches "Holocaust Studies" at a private Jewish medical school.

Very little of the eyewitnesses' testimony would stand up under cross-examination.  Several Exterminationists such as Gerald Reitlinger, Hannah Arendt and Gitta Sereny, have admitted that much "survivor testimony" has been bogus.

Among the many innocents railroaded by Nazi hunters is John Demjanjuk (born April 3, 1920). He is a retired auto worker and former United States citizen, who gained notoriety after being accused of Holocaust-related war crimes.  He actually even had a trial in Israel and was found innocent, now to maintain German guilt, he is on trial there for murders at Sobibor.  It is said that at Sobibor there are up to 300,000 bodies buried.  They haven’t found one!

The International Tracing Service (ITS) in Bad Arolsen, Germany, is the internationally governed archive which is tasked to document the fate of millions of civilians of Nazi Germany.  The documents in the ITS archives include original records from concentration camps, details of forced labor, and files on displaced persons.  ITS preserves the original documents and clarifies the fate of those persecuted by the Nazis.  ITS was founded in 1943 as an organization dedicated to finding missing persons, typically lost to family and friends as a result of war or political unrest during World War II.  The service operates under the legal authority of the Bonn Agreement, is under the administrative umbrella of the International Committee of the Red Cross and is funded by the government of Germany.  Since November 2007, the archives are said to be accessible for researchers, but it is closed for general research.  The Germans kept great records, and these records would prove the Holocaust is a hoax.  It is run by Jewish administration.  The center has been able to authenticate 291,594 wartime deaths in all camps, prison or otherwise, of all races and reasons.  The vast majority died through disease and the lack of welfare due to Allied bombing.

Yad Vashem Holocaust History Museum in Jerusalem has duplicated and triplicated every name they could find, ones who were lost in the post war transfers.  They also admit that over half of the 20,000 testimonies are unreliable (perhaps all?).

International Holocaust Remembrance Day was designated by the United Nations General Assembly Resolution 60/7 on 1 November 2005 during the 42nd plenary session. What about all the other ‘genocides’ in history?

The Holocaust has become the central issue of Judaism.  It is to Judaism, as Christ is to Christianity.  It is forbidden to change the sacred number of six million or cast any doubt on its principles, even though scholarly research has declared it all null and void.  To declare or compare any other people suffering to the Jewish Holocaust is to invite the wrath of the Jewish Gatekeepers.  As an example, Alvin Rosenfeld turns with outrage to Gentile writers who dare to pay sympathetic attention to Jews and the Holocaust in an unacceptable manner, i.e., using poetic license to appropriate Holocaust imagery and Jewish victimhood to address (non-Jewish) personal suffering in their poems.  Rosenfeld attacks the poet Sylvia Plath (ultimately a suicide) for this crime.  He quotes this excerpt from one of her poems:  “An engine, an engine Chuffing me off like a Jew.  A Jew to Dachau, Auschwitz, Belsen.  I begin to talk like a Jew.  I think I may well be a Jew.   The snows of the Tyrol, the clear beer of Vienna Are not very pure or true. With my gypsy ancestress and my weird luck And my Tarok pack and my Tarok pack I may be a bit of a Jew.”

About half of the so-called neo-Nazi or Anti-Semitic grafitti or harassment in the US turns out to be done by Jews.  European incidents are probably of the same percentage.  Jewish ideology of ‘the Chosen People’, needs fear to keep the tribe together.  Many Jewish groups are parasites living off of their own people demanding money while creating fear.  To stop Anti-Semitism, Jews need to discard their Supremacist Ideology and to police their own ranks for conspiracies against Gentiles.

Years of resources have been used in this paper including dozens of mainstream journals and magazines of the past.  Several internet sources have been used to supplement this Timeline including mainstream Wikipedia and other sources.  Caution must be given to Wikipedia with its liberal Jewish bias.  All information has also been easily discovered on the Internet and larger library. 

Given the cultural background of Jews, their survivor testimonies and ‘histories’ are to be immediately suspect.  There are also plenty of Gentiles to suspect.

**** These are several ‘contemporary’ Jew Historians (from Wikipedia 2012), their tribal allegiances make their objectivity suspect.  Historians of subjects before 1800 are left off: David Abulafia, British; Ignac Acsady, Hungarian; Cyrus Adler, U.S. (Jewish); Geoffrey Alderman; Herbert Aptheker, Communist Party; Yehoshua Arieli, Israeli; Walter Leonard Arnstein, U.S.; Raymond Aron, French sociology; Robert Aron, French; Simon Ashkenazi, Polish; David Ayalon, Israeli Islam and Judaism; Bernard Bailyn, U.S. Colonial; Richard Barnett, archaeologist; George Louis Beer, U.S. 16th-19th commerce; Emile-Auguste Begin; Max Beloff, English; Joaquim Bensaude Portuguese astronomy and navigation; Norman Bentwich, British; Israeli Bercovici, Romanian; Jay R. Berkovitz, U.S. Jews in France; Harry Bernstein, U.S.; Camille Bloch, French; Solomon Frank Bloom, U.S. Europe.; Jerome Blum, U.S.; Daniel Boorstin, U.S.; Woodrow Wilson Borah, U.S.; Ambrosio Brandao, Portuguese; Harry Bresslau, German; Berthold Bretholz, Moravian; Jacob Bronowski, science; Robert Brunschvig, French Islam; Max Buedinger, German; Achille Coen, Italian; David Cohen, Dutch; Michael Confino, Israeli; Hermann Dessau, German; Isaac Deutscher, British Marxist; Max Dimont; Martin Duberman, U.S.; Ariel Durant, (The Story of Civilization); Louis Eisenman, French; Abraham Eisenstadt, U.S.; Amos Elon, Israeli; Louis Filler, U.S.; Sidney Fine, U.S.; Samuel Finer, British; Robert Fogel, US; Heinrich Friedjung, Moravian; Saul Friedländer, French-Israeli Holocaust; Peter Gay, US ideas; Leo Gershoy, U.S.; Felix Gilbert, U.S.; Sir Martin Gilbert, British; Carlo Ginzburg, Italian; Eric F. Goldman, U.S.; Yosef Goldman, US;  Martin Goodman; Louis Reichenthal Gottschalk, U.S.; Philip Guedalla; Elie Halevy, French (English 1915-30); George W. F. Hallgarten; Theodore Stephen Hamerow, U.S.; Marceli Handelsman, Polish; Oscar Handlin, U.S.; Henry Harrisse, U.S.; Ludo Moritz Hartmann, Austrian; Sigmund Herzberg-Fraenkel, Austrian; Jack H. Hexter, U.S.; Uriel Heyd, Israeli (Islam); Raul Hilberg, US (Holocaust); Gertrude Himmelfarb, (Victorian Britain); Eric Hobsbawm, British Marxist; Richard Hofstadter, U.S.; Samuel Justin Hurwitz, U.S.; Harold Melvin Hyman, U.S.; Siegfried Isaacsohn, German; Jonathan Israel, British; Joseph Jacobs; Oscar Isaiah Janowsky, U.S. (Europe and Jews); Lisa Jardine, British; Louis de Jong, Dutch; Matthew Josephson, U.S.; Solomon Katz, U.S.; Elie Kedourie, British; Morton Keller, U.S.; James Klugmann, communist; Richard Koebner, Israeli German; Hans Kohn, U.S.; Michael Kraus, U.S.; Leonard Krieger, U.S.; Hyman Kublin, U.S. (far east); Thomas Samuel Kuhn, U.S. (science); Otto Kurz; Gyula Lanczy, Hungarian (economic); David Landes, U.S. (economic); Max Laserson, Latvian; Sir Sidney Lee; Max Lerner, U.S.; Yitzchak Levine, columnist; Arthur Levy, French; Leonard William Levy, U.S.; Paul Levy, French (linguistic); Bernard Lewis, British orientalist; David Malcolm Lewis; Ephraim Lipson, British; Deborah Lipstadt, U.S. Holocaust; Victor Loewe, German; Sidney Low, British; Samuel Lozinski, Russian; John Lukacs, Hungarian-US; Hyam Maccoby; Sir Philip Magnus-Allcroft; Frank Manuel, U.S.; Henrik Marczali, Hungarian; Shula Marks, South African-British (African); Ludwig Markus, German (Abyssinian and Beta Israeli); Arno J. Mayer, US; Gustav Mayer, German; Mark Borisovich Mitin, Russian; Arnaldo Momigliano, Italian-British; Felice Momigliano, Italian; Richard Brandon Morris, U.S.; Louis C. Morton, U.S.; George Mosse, US; Friederich Munzer, German classical; Gustavus Myers, U.S.; Nadav Na`aman, Israeli (biblical times); Oskar Nachod, German; Lewis Bernstein Namier, British; Alexander Nove; Michael Oren, Israeli; Sir Francis Palgrave, British; Ilan Pappé, Israeli; Martin Phillipson, German; Koppel S. Pinson, U.S.; Richard Pipes, US (Russia); Karl Polanyi; Sidney Pomerantz, U.S.; Richard Popkin; Samuel A. Portnoy, US (Jewish and East European); Sir Michael Postan, British; Joshua Prawer, Israeli (Jerusalem and the crusades); Alfred Francis Pribram (de), Anglo-Austrian; Jacob Psantir, Rumanian (Jews); Armin Rappaport, U.S.; Sidney Ratner, U.S.; Ludwig Riess, German; Samuele Romanin, Italian (Judaism); Nello Roselli, Italian; Arthur Rosenberg, German (Zionist); Cecil Roth, British; Julius Salomon, Danish; Simon Schama, British; J. Salwyn Schapiro, US; Leonard Schapiro; David Schoenbaum; Moses Schorr, (Polish Jews); Debra Schultz, US (feminist); Yossi Schwartz (Jews); Hugh Sebag-Montefiore, British WW2; Simon Sebag Montefiore, British (Russia); Tom Segev, Israeli; Arturo Segre, Italian; Avraham Sela, Israeli; Enrique Semo, Mexican; Bernard Semmel, U.S; Michael Shamah, British; Moshe Shamir, Israeli; Leeor Shimron, US; Avi Shlaim, Israeli: Joseph Shulim, U.S.; Paul Simson, German; Charles Singer, British; Louis Snyder, U.S.; Sir Aurel Stein, archeologist; Henri Stein, French; Alfred Stern, Swiss; Barry Supple, British; Jacob Talmon, Israeli; Frank Tannenbaum, U.S.; Rosa Levin Toubin, Jewish Texan; Hans Trefousse, U.S.; Barbara Tuchman, U.S.; Irwin Unger, U.S.; Geza Vermes, British; Bernard Weisberger, U.S.; Eduard Wertheimer, Hungarian; Helene Wieruszowski, U.S.; Bertram Wolfe, U.S. Soviet; Leonard Woolf, British; Oscar Zeichner, U.S.; Alfred Zimmern, British; Carl A. Zimring, US; Howard Zinn, US.

****Historiography of Nazi Germany:

These are several of the Historians in this Thesis whom have written about Nazi Germany:  (Should there not be suspicions toward a Jew’s scholarship for his subjectiveness toward his Tribe?  Many of these books do not use original material, but reference oral testimonies which may become more subjective and less factual through their retelling.  There are a few Jews listed here who escaped from German prison camps. How can that be?)                 

                                                WARNING                               Jew Holocaust Court Historians

Jews: Yitzhak Arad (2007); "Hannah" Arendt (1963); Ivo Banac (1984); Yehuda Bauer (1977); Zygmunt Bauman(1957); Michael Berenbaum (1979); Donald Bloxham (2001); Randolph L. Braham (1963); Richard Breitman(1991); Alan Bullock (Jew?)(1952); Barbara S. Burstin (2012); David Cesarani (1992); Richard I. (Yerachmiel) Cohen (1968); Shamai Davidson (1979); Lucy Dawidowicz(1975); Debórah Dwork (1991); David Engel (1987); Andrew (Andrievs) Ezergailis (1983); Emil Fackenheim (1960); Henry Friedlander (1989); Saul Friedländer(1966); Tuvia Friling (2004); Robert Gerwarth (2005); Martin Gilbert (1979); Daniel Goldhagen(1996); Ivo Goldstein (2001); Slavko Goldstein (2001); Gideon Greif (1983); Israel Gutman (1961); Abel J Herzberg (1989); Raul Hilberg(1961); Andreas Hillgruber(1954); Hajo Holborn (wife is Jew)(1956); Dovid Katz (2008); Jacob Katz (1950); Steven T. Katz  (1975); Simon Kitson (Jew?)(1995); David Kranzler (1987); Claude Lanzmann (1985); Nora Levin (1989); Deborah Lipstadt (1986); Peter Longerich (Jew?)(2003); Richard Löwenthal(1964); Yaacov Lozowick (2002); Thomas Lutz (2012); Lothar Machtan(2001); Rachel Margolis (2008); Michael Marrus (1977); Rafael Medoff (1987); Friedrich Meinecke(1946); George Mosse(1965); Lewis Namier (1952); Stephen H. Norwood (2009); Peter Novick (1988); Janusz Piekałkiewicz(?)(1973); Franciszek Piper (1991); Richard Plant (1986); Antony Polonsky (1972); Terrence Des Pres (1976); (Jacob) Presser (1965); Eva Reichmann(1945); Mark Roseman (2001); Hans Rothfels(1948); Jules Schelvis (2012); Hans Schoeps 2012;   Lawrence Shirer (1960); Gerald Steinacher (2009); Fritz Stern (1963); Kenneth S. Stern (1993); Nechama Tec (1986); Vladimir Tismăneanu (2006); Enzo Traverso (1999); Pierre Vidal-Naquet (1995); "Kenny" Waltzer (2012); Gerhard Weinberg 1985; Jankiel Wiernik (1972); Gabriel Wilensky (2010); David S. Wyman (1968); Hanna Yablonka (1999); Susan S Zuccotti (1987); Ingo Zechner (2000); Sara Plager-Zyskind (1981;

Of course some Jews are fair and many Gentiles try to stretch the Court History into forms of Truth.

Unfortunately, many Gentile Holocaust Court Historians…  (How many cryptoJews?)

Non-Jews: David Blackbourn (1980); Karl Bracher; Martin Broszat(1966); Christopher Browning(1992); Gordon Craig(1996); Norman Davies(1986); Geoffrey Eley (1984); Robert Ericksen (1985); Richard Evans(1976); Michael F. Feldkamp (2000); Joachim Fest(1994); Fritz Fischer (1961); Norman J. W. Goda (1998); David P. Gushee (2008); Michael Hagemeister(2006); Brigitte Hamann(1999); Ulrich Herbert(1997); Klaus Hildebrand(1969); Joachim Hoffmann(1996); Heinz Höhne(1967); Eberhard Jäckel(1966); Klas-Göran Karlsson (2012); Michael Kater(1966); Ian Kershaw(1985); Eberhard Kolb(1984); Franklin Littell (1976); Timothy Mason(1975); Hans Mommsen(1979); Wolfgang Mommsen(1959); Arthur D. Morse (1968); Sönke Neitzel(2007); Heinz Neumeyer (1953); Thomas Nipperdey(1983); Jeremy Noakes 2001; (Steve) Paulsson (2000); Robert Jan van Pelt(2005); Edward N. Peterson(1954); Detlev Peukert(1990); Léon Poliakov (1956); Jean-Claude Pressac (1988); Gerhard Albert Ritter(1991); Gerhard G B Ritter(1967); Jürgen Rohwer (1960); Ronald J. Rychlak (2000);Theodor Schieder(1984); Walter Schlesinger(1984); Claudia Schoppmann(1991); Percy Schramm (1962); Hagen Schulze(1996); Hans-Günther Seraphim(1949); Hasso Spode(1985); Michael Stürmer(1986); Jochen Thies(1976); Douglas F. Tobler (1998); Henry Ashby Turner, Jr. (1985); Hannah Vogt(1961); Hans-Ulrich Wehler (leftist)(1969); Heinrich Winkler(1976); Robert Wolfe (1975); Michael Zimmerman(1996); Rainer Zitelmann(2000);

****Sonderweg ("special path") is a controversial theory in German historiography that considers the German-speaking lands, or the country Germany, to have followed a unique course from aristocracy to democracy, distinct from other European countries.  It is also used to explain German foreign policy and ideology before and during WW I, which was characterized by trying to find a "Third Way" to be implemented for the world, other than western "vulgar" democracy or eastern Czaristic autocracy.  This theory has progressively gained a following since the late 1960s.  In particular, its proponents argue that the way Germany developed over the centuries virtually ensured the evolution of a social and political order along the lines of Nazi Germany.  In their view, German mentalities, the structure of society, and institutional developments followed a different course in comparison with the other nations of the West, which had a "normal" development of their histories.

The term Sonderweg was first used by German conservatives in the Imperial period, starting in the late 19th century as a source of pride at the "Golden Mean" of governance that in their view had been attained by the German state, whose distinctiveness as an authoritarian state lay in taking the initiative in instituting social reforms, imposing them without waiting to be pressured by demands "from below".  This type of authoritarianism was seen avoiding both the autocracy of Imperial Russia and what they regarded as the weak, decadent and ineffective democratic governments of Britain and France.  The idea of Germany as a great Central European power, neither of the West nor of the East was to be a recurring feature of right-wing German thought right up to 1945.

Historian Hans-Ulrich Wehler of the Bielefeld School places the origins of Germany's path to disaster in the 1860s-1870s, when economic modernization took place, but political modernization did not happen and the old Prussian rural elite remained in firm control of the army, diplomacy and the civil service.  Traditional, aristocratic, premodern society battled an emerging capitalist, bourgeois, modernizing society. Recognizing the importance of modernizing forces in industry and the economy and in the cultural realm, Wehler argues that reactionary traditionalism dominated the political hierarchy of power in Germany, as well as social mentalities and in class relations.

The story of Nazi Germany's occupation of Czechoslovakia in March 1939 and its invasion of Poland in September 1939 provoked the drive to explain the phenomenon of Nazi Germany.  In 1940, Judeophile Sebastian Haffner, a German émigré living in Britain, published Germany: Jekyll and Hyde, in which he argued it was Adolf Hitler alone, by the force of his peculiar personality, who had brought about Nazi Germany. In 1941, the British diplomat Robert Vansittart published “The Black Record: Germans Past And Present”, according to which Nazism was only the latest manifestation of what Vansittart argued were the exclusively German traits of aggressiveness and brutality.  Other books with a thesis similar to Vansittart's were Rohan O'Butler's “The Roots of National Socialism” (1941) and William Montgomery McGovern's “From Luther to Hitler: The History of Nazi-Fascist Philosophy” (1946).

After Germany's defeat in World War II in 1945, the term Sonderweg lost its positive connotations from the 19th century and acquired its present negative meaning.  There was much debate about the origins of this "German catastrophe" (as the German historian Meinecke titled his 1946 book) of Nazi Germany's rise and fall.  Until the mid-1960s, the Sonderweg debate was polarized with most non-German participants at one pole and German participants at the other.  Historians like Léon Poliakov, A. J. P. Taylor, and (Jew) Sir Lewis Bernstein Namier, echoed by journalists like the American Jew William L. Shirer, portrayed Nazism as the inevitable result of German history, reflecting unique flaws in "German national character" that went back to the days of Martin Luther, if not earlier.

In contrast, German historians such as Jew Friedrich Meinecke, Jew Hans Rothfels, and Gerhard Ritter, joined by a few non-German historians such as Pieter Geyl, contended that the Nazi period had no relationship to earlier periods of German history, and that German traditions were at sharp variance with the totalitarianism of the Nazi movement.  Meinecke famously described National Socialism in his 1946 book ("The German Catastrophe") as a particularly unfortunate ("on-the-job accident") of history.  They have been joined by their intellectual heirs Klaus Hildebrand, Karl Dietrich Bracher, and Henry Ashby Turner in contending that though the Nazi dictatorship was rooted in the German past, it was individual choices made during the later Weimar years that led to the Nazi years.

Starting in the 1960s, historians such as Fritz Fischer and Hans-Ulrich Wehler argued that, unlike France and Britain, Germany had experienced only "partial modernization", in which industrialization was not followed by changes in the political and social spheres.  The crucial turning point was the Revolution of 1848, when German liberals failed to seize power and consequently either emigrated or chose to resign themselves to being ruled by a reactionary elite, living in a society that taught its children obedience, glorification of militarism, and pride in a very complex notion of German culture.

Another version of the Sonderweg thesis emerged in the US in the 1950s-1960s, when historians such as Fritz Stern and George Mosse examined the anti-Semitic völkisch movement.  Christopher Browning in “Ordinary Men” (1992) opposed the theory of anti-Semitic Germans and concluded that these typical middle class workers were not ingrained with anti-Semitism, but rather became killers through peer pressure and indoctrination.  Jew Daniel Goldhagen in “Hitler's Willing Executioners” (1996) countered that German society, politics, and life up until 1945 were characterized by a unique version of extreme anti-Semitism that held the murder of Jews as the highest possible national value.

Michael Stürmer contends that Germany’s precarious geographical situation in the heart of Central Europe left successive German governments no other choice but to engage in authoritarianism.  

The leading critics of the Sonderweg thesis have been two British Marxist historians, Geoff Eley and David Blackbourn, who in their 1984 book The Peculiarities of German History argued that there is no "normal" course of social and political change; that the experience of France and Britain in the 19th century was not the norm for Europe; and that even if the liberal German middle class was disempowered at the national political level, it nevertheless dominated the social, economic and cultural life of 19th century Germany.  This embourgeoisement of German social life was greater than in Britain and France, which was more distinctly marked by aristocratic values than was Germany.  There was no Sonderweg, and it is ahistorical to judge why Germany did not become Britain for the simple reason that Germany is Germany and Britain is Britain.  Moreover, after 1890 there was a tendency towards greater democratization in German society with the growth of civil society as reflected in the growth of trade unions and a more or less free press.

(Frank?) Schubert states that the history of the Holy Roman Empire is not to be confused with the Sonderweg, which can only be seen as a result of the concept of German identity, developing in the Romanticism of the late 18th century, reinforced by the Napoleonic Wars in which Germany was under French occupation.  Previous events, especially not those of the Holy Roman Empire, cannot be related to the evolution of Nazism.

(This author agrees with Sonderweg, every country is unique.  I would agree that Germany’s central location and its less materialist stance because of a deeper Christianity would make it unique.)

****The Historikerstreit ("historians' quarrel") was an intellectual and political controversy during 1986-1989 in West Germany about the crimes of Nazi Germany, including their comparability with the crimes of the Soviet Union.  The positions taken by the right-wing intellectuals were largely based on the totalitarianism approach which takes a comparative approach to totalitarian states, while left-wing intellectuals argued that fascism was uniquely evil, referred to as the Sonderweg approach, and could not be compared to the crimes of Soviet communism.  The first were accused by their critics of downplaying Nazi crimes, while the latter were accused by their critics of downplaying Soviet crimes.  In most of Eastern and Central Europe, a comparative approach to Soviet and Nazi crimes is the mainstream scholarly and official position taken.  In the western world, the debate revolving around issues similar to those of the Historikerstreit was renewed following the publication of The Black Book of Communism in 1997.  The British historian Norman Davies argued in 2006 that revelations made after the Fall of Communism in Eastern Europe after 1989-91 about Soviet crimes had discredited the left-wing position in the Historikerstreit debate.

(This author would not even agree that the Nazi government was evil.  Its government was thankfully trying to present a Christian society for its People.  Practically all of the other competitors of Hitler were authoritarian in nature.)

Two of the more debated questions were whether Nazism was in some way part of the “German national character”, and how much responsibility, if any, the German people bore for the crimes of Nazism.  Non-German historians A. J. P. Taylor and Sir Lewis Namier, argued that the vast majority of Germans were responsible for Nazi crimes.  Liberals emphasized Hitler's personal role and responsibility.  Within West Germany then, most historians were strongly defensive.  In the assessment of Gerhard Ritter and others, Nazism was a totalitarian movement that represented only the work of a small criminal clique; Germans were victims of Nazism, and the Nazi era represented a total break in German history.  Starting in the 1960s, that assessment was challenged by younger German historians.  Fritz Fischer argued in favor of a Sonderweg conception of German history that saw Nazism as the inevitable result of the way German society had developed. Functionalists cast blame for the Holocaust across society.  Many right-wing German historians disliked the implications of the Sonderweg conception and the functionalist school.  (They disliked this because it was connected with EVIL CRIMES.  If no real crimes, as the Truth holds, they would have accepted it.)  By the mid-1980s, right-wing German historians began to think it was time for the nation to start celebrating much of its history again.  Two proposed museums celebrating modern German history were to be built in West Berlin and Bonn.  

The debate opened in 1986 when Ernst Nolte wrote (“The past that won't go away”).  Nolte argued that the “race murder” of the Nazi death camps was a “defensive reaction” to the “class murder” of the Stalinist system of gulags.  In his view, the gulags were the original and greater horror.  In the face of the threat of Bolshevism, it was reasonable that the German people would turn to Nazi fascism.  Jürgen Habermas complained that historians such as Michael Stürmer and Andreas Hillgruber were seeking to whitewash the German past, and uniquely German aspects of the Holocaust.  In Hillgruber's 1986 book Zweierlei Untergang (“Two kinds of downfall: the smashing of the German Reich and the end of European Jewry”), he lamented the mass expulsions of ethnic Germans from Czechoslovakia and Poland at the end of World War II and compared the sufferings of the Heimatvertriebene (“those expelled from their native land”) to that of victims of the Holocaust.  Hillgruber had not supported Nolte, but the controversy over Zweierlei Untergang became linked with Nolte's views when Habermas and Wehler characterized both men as conservatives trying to minimize Nazi crimes.

The debate centered on four main questions: 1)Were the crimes of Nazi Germany uniquely evil in history, or were other crimes, such as those of Joseph Stalin in the Soviet Union, comparably evil?  2)Did German history follow a "special path" (the above mentioned Sonderweg) leading inevitably to Nazism? (The West German historians Klaus Hildebrand, Gerhard Ritter, and Andreas Hillgruber rejected the Sonderweg view, while the British historian A. J. P. Taylor and the West German historians Hans-Ulrich Wehler, Wolfgang Mommsen, Hans Mommsen and Fritz Fischer supported it.  A sub-issue of the Sonderweg thesis concerned the reasons for the alleged Sonderweg. Stürmer argued for geographical factors as the reason for the Sonderweg while Wehler insisted on cultural and social factors.)  3)Were other genocides comparable to the Holocaust?  4)Were the crimes of the Nazis a reaction to Soviet crimes under Stalin, as Nolte contended? Should the German people bear a special burden of guilt for Nazi crimes, or could new generations of Germans find sources of pride in their history?

On one side of the argument were the philosopher Jürgen Habermas, and the historians Hans-Ulrich Wehler, Jürgen Kocka, Hans Mommsen, Martin Broszat, Heinrich August Winkler, Eberhard Jäckel, and Wolfgang Mommsen.  On the other (better) side were the philosopher Ernst Nolte, the journalist Joachim Fest, and the historians Andreas Hillgruber, Klaus Hildebrand, Rainer Zitelmann, Hagen Schulze, and Michael Stürmer.  Karl Dietrich Bracher and Richard Löwenthal argued for some compromise; they said that comparing different totalitarian systems was a valid intellectual exercise, but insisted that the Holocaust should not be compared to other genocides.  A few foreign historians also contributed to the debate. The British historians Richard J. Evans and Ian Kershaw sided with the Sonderweg position.  The American historian Gordon A. Craig was highly critical of the views of Nolte, but generally defended Hillgruber.

****Guilt Everywhere- "struggle to come to terms with the past": Vergangenheitsbewältigung is a composite German word that describes processes of dealing with the past (Vergangenheit = past; Bewältigung = coming to terms with, mastering), which is perhaps best rendered in English as "struggle to come to terms with the past".  The German term Geschichtsaufarbeitung (lit. "processing of history") describes similar processes, but is less common.  IT describes the attempt to analyze, digest and learn to live with the past, in particular the Holocaust.  The term deals at once with the concrete responsibility of the German state (West Germany assumed the legal obligations of the Reich) and of individual Germans for what took place "under Hitler," and with questions about the roots of legitimacy of German society.  More recently, the IT has also been used in the former East Germany to refer to the process of working through the brutalities of Communist institutions.  IT often is seen as the logical "next step," after a denazification driven at first under Allied Occupation and then by the Christian Democratic Union government of Konrad Adenauer.  It dates from the late 1950s and early 1960s, roughly the period in which the work of the (reconstruction) became less absorbing and urgent.  Having replaced the institutions and power structures of Nazism, the aim of liberal Germans was to deal with the guilt of recent history.  

The German churches have developed a specifically German post-war theology of repentance.  At the regular mass church rallies, this theme is developed as a leitmotiv of Christian youth.  The main institutionally driven sphere of IT is in the schools, where in most German states the centrally-written curriculum subjects every child to repeated lessons on different aspects of Nazism in German, history, politics and religion classes from the fifth grade onwards.  Typically there are school trips to concentration camps, and Jewish Holocaust survivors are often invited to schools as guest speakers, though the passage of time limits these opportunities.  In the cultural sphere, IT arises in German literature, characterized by such authors as Günter Grass and Siegfried Lenz. Lenz's novel Deutschstunde and Grass's Danziger Trilogie both deal with childhood under Nazism, and are a good starting point for this literature.  The erection of public monuments to Holocaust victims has been a particular theme in Germany's Vergangenheitsbewältigung. Concentration camps such as Dachau, Buchenwald, Bergen-Belsen and Flossenbürg are open to visitors as memorials and museums. Most towns have plaques on walls marking the spots where particular atrocities took place.

(Enough guilt, the Allied Court Historians are still in charge.)

****Continentalists vs. Globalists: The foreign policy and war aims of the Nazis have been the subject of debate among historians.  There has been disagreement over whether Adolf Hitler, their leader, aimed solely at European expansion and domination, or whether he planned, in the long-term, for a global empire. (Wikipedia wording)  This argument originates from the 1960s by Continentalists Gunter Moltmann and Andreas Hillgruber who claim that it was Hitler’s dream to create ‘Eutopia’.  Globalists claim the evidence of Germany’s preparation for war in the years 1933-39 with increased interest in naval building, and Hitler’s decision to declare war on the USA after the attack on Pearl Harbor, which shows Hitler’s determination.  Continentalist Hildebrand believed Hitler had a carefully premeditated (step-by-step) for Lebensraum.  Globalist Hillgruber claims he intended intercontinental conquest afterwards.  Globalist Jeremy Noakes and Globalist Geoffrey Pridham believe that taking Mein Kampf and the Zweites Buch together, Hitler had a five stage plan; 1)rearmament and Rhineland re-militarization, 2)Austria, Czech and Poland to become German satellites, 3)defeat France or neutralize her through a British alliance, 4)Lebensraum in Russia and finally 5)world domination. Globalist Norman J. W. Goda agrees, believing that his ultimate aim was the defeat and overthrow of the US, against whose threat he would guarantee the British Empire in return for a free hand to pursue Lebensraum in the East.  Hitler had long term plans for French North Africa and in 1941 begun to prepare a base for a transatlantic attack on the United States.  Globalist David Cameron Watt, who in 1990 believed that Hitler had no long terms plans, now agrees with Goda and believes that Hitler refused to make concessions to Spanish and Italian leaders Francisco Franco and Benito Mussolini in order to conciliate a defeated France so that such preparations could proceed.  Globalist Jochen Thies has been noted to say that plans for world domination can be seen in Hitler's ideology of displaying power. The creation of magnificent buildings and the use of propaganda to demonstrate German strength, along with the message to create a Reich to last a thousand years, clearly show Hitler's aspirations for the future.  Continentalist Fritz Fischer claims that Hitler wanted an empire to protect German interests at a time of economic instability and pressure from competing Global empires.  Continentalist Martin Broszat offers a case in declaring that Hitler was still dreaming of Eutopia when he did not include Poland in his plans before 1939, and focused upon Czechoslovakia and Austria instead; easily attainable territories.  In 1961, A. J. P. Taylor wrote Origins of the Second World War describes Hitler as a normal German leader and an opportunist in foreign policy, which created the whole argument on the nature of Nazi foreign policy.

(This author would disagree with both sides, as Hitler only wanted German unity and Peace and Economic alliances, not political hegemony.)

****Functionalism (or structuralism) versus Intentionalism is a debate about the origins of the Holocaust as well as most aspects of the Third Reich, such as foreign policy.  The debate on the origins of the Holocaust centers on essentially two questions:  Was there a master plan on the part of Adolf Hitler to launch the Holocaust?  Intentionalists argue there was such a plan, while functionalists argue there was not.   Did the initiative for the Holocaust come from above with orders from Adolf Hitler or from below within the ranks of the German bureaucracy?  Intentionalists argue the initiative came from above, while functionalists contend it came from lower ranks within the bureaucracy.

The terms were coined in a 1981 essay by the British Marxist historian Timothy Mason.  Notable functionalists have included Jew Raul Hilberg, dupe Christopher Browning, leftist Hans Mommsen, Jew Martin Broszat, and Jew Zygmunt Bauman.  Notable intentionalists have included Jew Andreas Hillgruber, dupe German Karl Dietrich Bracher, dupe German Klaus Hildebrand, dupe German Eberhard Jäckel, Jew (?) Richard Breitman, and Jew Lucy Dawidowicz.  Neither side disputes the reality of the Holocaust.

Of course, there was no Holocaust as presented.  The Germans are noted for being meticulous record keepers. There were no written orders from Hitler or anyone to approve of the killing of Jews.  There were also no proof of gas chambers, etc.  This is a debate among Holocaust promoters not real historians.

(This author would not accept either of these stances since the Holocaust described by Court Historians did not occur!)

**There is Hope: Even though the Press continues to purposely mislead with the use of deliberate mistranslations throughout the years of diverse nations such as Germany and Iran, with the use of “Extermination” and such, the nation of Israel and the Talmudic religion of Judaism may become extinct someday.  The hope of assimilation and the loss of cohesion for Zionism and Talmudism will rid the world of these menaces.  Yet the elite will continue to build its wealth a weave their webs of control over humanity.  This is a battle that must not end with the defeat of Judaic superiority.  This is still a battle of Jewish materialism versus Christian humanism.

_______________________________________________________________________________________________________

As disclosure and understanding of the author of this timeline, he is a regular Joe, 58 yrs old, half white collar with two Masters, one in the Ministry and another in Counseling and half blue collar with half his life in labor jobs.  He was Raised Northern Baptist with a light dose of Zionism.  An initial eye-opening came when a university professor suggested that we should have let Patton finish the job with Moscow.  Another was from a German violin maker who had been in the wartime German army, but was not a Nazi.  He has been interested in these subjects for 30 years.