(My original has many pictures and illustrations. Please excuse this installment until I am
able to complete it.)
2013 2013 2013 2013
How Japan views China and South
Korea:
Those holding
negative views of South Korea exceed those with positive views for the first
time in the survey’s history, a dramatic and rapid reversal of previous scores.
The number of Japanese who lack “affinity” for China now exceed those with
positive feelings for the country by a proportion of over four-to-one. Here are
the official results (the blue represents “friendly” feelings, the black line
negative), and below that some thoughts on why this matters:
1/25, 2013 David Ward, a Democrat MP in Britain faces
expulsion from the party for saying Jews had not learned from the murder of six
million in the Holocaust in their treatment of Palestinian Authority Arabs, the
Daily Mail reports. He wrote on his own
website that he was “saddened” that Jews “could within a few years of
liberation from the death camps be inflicting atrocities on Palestinians…on a
daily basis.” Jon Benjamin, chief
executive of the Board of Deputies of British Jews, said, “We are outraged and
shocked at these offensive comments about Jewish victims of the Holocaust and
the suggestion that Jews should have learned a lesson from the experience.”
1/27, 2013 Former Israeli PM Ariel Sharon showed
brain activity seven years into comatose state.
Sharon, 84, led Israel from 2001 until suffering a stroke in 2006. Since
then, he has been in a vegetative state, connected to a respirator. Sharon was a storied military officer who
fought in three wars before entering politics.
1/27,
2013 Former Italian PM Silvio Berlusconi has defended the Mussolini’s
decision to ally with Adolf Hitler.
"Obviously the government of that time, out of fear that German
power might lead to complete victory, preferred to ally itself with Hitler's
Germany rather than opposing it," he said. "As part of this alliance,
there were impositions, including combating and exterminating Jews. The racial laws were the worst fault of Mussolini
as a leader, who in so many other ways did well." Reacting to the statement, Rabbi Marvin Hier,
founder of the Los Angeles-based Simon Wiesenthal Center, called it "the
height of revisionism to try to reinstate an Italian dictator who helped legitimize
and prop up Hitler as a 'reincarnated good guy.' "
Future
Inserts:
Sun Feb 24 2013 Purim,
the Jewish holiday of Revenge against Gentiles. Israelites celebrate annual Purim with
parades through Hebron or other Arab areas, past Palestinian shops and
dwellings, with an effigy of Haman draped in a kaffiyeh. Jews throughout the world label specific
enemies as Haman and Christianity in general as Haman. Other episodes of revenge throughout the year
could still be connected to the spirit of Purim.
****May -
Jewish-American Heritage Month
Sun Mar 16
2014 Purim, the Jewish holiday of
Revenge against Gentiles. Israelites
celebrate annual Purim with parades through Hebron or other Arab areas, past
Palestinian shops and dwellings, with an effigy of Haman draped in a
kaffiyeh. Jews throughout the world label
specific enemies as Haman and Christianity in general as Haman. Other episodes of revenge throughout the year
could still be connected to the spirit of Purim.
****May -
Jewish-American Heritage Month
Thu Mar 5
2015 Purim, the Jewish holiday of Revenge
against Gentiles. Israelites
celebrate annual Purim with parades through Hebron or other Arab areas, past
Palestinian shops and dwellings, with an effigy of Haman draped in a
kaffiyeh. Jews throughout the world
label specific enemies as Haman and Christianity in general as Haman. Other episodes of revenge throughout the year
could still be connected to the spirit of Purim.
****May -
Jewish-American Heritage Month
Will it soon
be time to kick the racist Jews out?
They already have infiltrated other countries to steal those people’s
resources. In recent centuries, they
were coerced out of Russia and flooded into Poland, Germany, Eastern Europe and
the US. In Germany, it was the perfect
storm when these rich Jews bought up Germany’s resources through cheap money
and poor Jews flooded Germany’s welfare system.
Today, in the US, they have created near bankruptcy through their frauds
of the Federal Reserve and endless wars and godless materialism and
multiculturalism. Assimilated,
non-Zionist or Talmudic Jews aside, they have become our Masters and are aliens
in our midst. Should we go back to the
laws of the Byzantine Empire which lasted successfully from 306 to about
1204? The Jews were “kept out of
banking, out of education, and out of government.” They could not control the economy, pervert
the youth, or betray the nation.
****Final Thoughts: ****
: Why is there not more said about the Jew Tribal Lobby? Remember, they monopolize the Media, the
Publishing world and other written word such as Critics. If anyone says anything about the Tribe or
their nation of Israel, they are immediately labeled as an anti-Semite and
their career is doomed. Even thought
this author has been only a little fish in the sea, he may have also been
black-balled in certain career fields for some of his (very mild)
statements. Just as Christians or
Conservatives are often black-balled, just add the crazy heresy of questioning
the Jews. Most of the Lobby’s work in
other fields is done by their useless-fools Gentile minions.
There’s no Business like Shoah
(Holocaust) Business……..
Israel gets
approximately $15 billion a year in direct and indirect aid from the American
taxpayers.
The US
military budget equals that of all other military budgets in the world
together. We have become an Empire,
imposing US Corporate will upon the world. Rome fell of internal dissension and
corruption and outside forces. They had
become an empire of ‘bread and circuses’ (welfare and diversions). Will America last much longer? This author believes in hope and human
vitality. We must throw off the
Antichrist masters.
Palestine as
an example of Jewish rule continues to be a huge concentration camp in Gaza and
the West Bank. Israel has the fourth
largest military in the world. Jews in America
frame the directions of the Media. For
instance, is Israel retaliating for Arab terrorism or are Arabs fighting for
their homes? The news our Media gets
about al Qaeda is from a single site from the Internet run by an Israeli. Disinformation? You bet!
Among the
many notable frauds in Holocaust scholarship is Elie Wiesel who claims to have
been liberated from Auschwitz, then Buchenwald, then Dachau. He claimed that blood spurted from the
ground. The photo that shows him in the
bunks has been proved to be another man.
(Jewish Supremacist) Eliezer "Elie" Wiesel (9/30,
1928- ) is a writer, professor at Boston
University, political activist, Nobel Laureate and Holocaust survivor. He is the author of 57 books, the best known
of which is Night, a work based on his experiences as a prisoner in the
Auschwitz and Buchenwald concentration camps.
His diverse range of other writings offer powerful and poetic
contributions to literature, theology, and his own articulation of Jewish
spirituality today. Wiesel was awarded
the Nobel Peace Prize in 1986. Wiesel
worked for the terrorist Irgun as a lying journalist.
(Jewish Supremacist) fraud Simon Wiesenthal (12/31, 1908 – 9/20, 2005) was an Austrian-Jewish
architectural engineer and camp survivor who became famous after World War II
for his work as a Nazi hunter who pursued Nazi war criminals. [Simon Wiesenthal
has lied throughout his career.]
Wiesenthal was one of 40 intellectuals from Lwow, Poland, jailed by the Nazis
in July 1941. All were incarcerated
except Simon, who agreed to become an informer.
This is why Wiesenthal was transferred to five Gestapo prisons and 12
different concentration camps. By being
moved about, he could do a more thorough job of snitching. No wonder the world class Nazi hunter refused
to see the author Cezar Solodar when the latter called up Wiesenthal's Vienna
office to arrange a meeting.
This
is how Simon Wiesenthal lied and how he forged the photo of German soldiers
executed by the Americans, as they appeared in Life-Magazine January,
1945. Wiesenthal published these
retouched photos for his book "KZ-Mauthausen" claiming that it
showed sadistically tortured and murdered concentration camp inmates. Notice
the painted-in striped prison uniforms.
(Jewish
Supremacists) Serge and Beate Klarsfeld-Serge (9/17, 1935, Bucharest,
Romania) and Beate (2/13, 1939, Berlin, Germany) Klarsfeld are activists known
for engaging in Holocaust documentation and anti-Nazi activism. They were involved in finding Klaus Barbie,
René Bousquet, Jean Leguay, Maurice Papon, and Paul Touvier to seek prosecution
for their war crimes. They have
continued to harass minor functionaries.
****Professional
Holocaust Survivors. Memories
change with age and motivation. There
were still a million survivors in the year 2000, a remarkable number much
higher than any other nationality.
Obviously, conditions were survivable enough, unlike the conditions for
German civilians and soldiers. There
have been more applicants for reparations, than ever lived in a camp. Liars lie, especially when their religion
accepts lies towards Gentiles.
Eyewitnesses- The New York Times (August 31, 1993,
Science Section) reported that interesting new research explains how people
"can confuse what is real and what is imagined, raising questions about
witnesses' testimony and memory itself."
Not one of the leading Holocaust
authors IS a historian. Raul Hilberg teaches political science. Gerald Reltlinger was an art
dealer. Lucy Dawldowicz teaches "Holocaust Studies" at a private Jewish
medical school.
Very little
of the eyewitnesses' testimony would stand up under cross-examination. Several Exterminationists such as Gerald
Reitlinger, Hannah Arendt and Gitta Sereny, have admitted that much
"survivor testimony" has been bogus.
Among the
many innocents railroaded by Nazi hunters is John Demjanjuk (born April 3,
1920). He is a retired auto worker and former United States citizen, who gained
notoriety after being accused of Holocaust-related war crimes. He actually even had a trial in Israel and
was found innocent, now to maintain German guilt, he is on trial there for
murders at Sobibor. It is said that at
Sobibor there are up to 300,000 bodies buried.
They haven’t found one!
The International Tracing Service
(ITS) in Bad Arolsen,
Germany, is the internationally governed archive which is tasked to document
the fate of millions of civilians of Nazi Germany. The documents in the ITS archives include
original records from concentration camps, details of forced labor, and files
on displaced persons. ITS preserves the
original documents and clarifies the fate of those persecuted by the
Nazis. ITS was founded in 1943 as an
organization dedicated to finding missing persons, typically lost to family and
friends as a result of war or political unrest during World War II. The service operates under the legal
authority of the Bonn Agreement, is under the administrative umbrella of the
International Committee of the Red Cross and is funded by the government of
Germany. Since November 2007, the
archives are said to be accessible for researchers, but it is closed for
general research. The Germans kept great
records, and these records would prove the Holocaust is a hoax. It is run by Jewish administration. The center has been able to authenticate
291,594 wartime deaths in all camps, prison or otherwise, of all races and
reasons. The vast majority died through
disease and the lack of welfare due to Allied bombing.
Yad Vashem Holocaust History Museum in Jerusalem has duplicated and
triplicated every name they could find, ones who were lost in the post war
transfers. They also admit that over
half of the 20,000 testimonies are unreliable (perhaps all?).
International Holocaust Remembrance
Day was designated by
the United Nations General Assembly Resolution 60/7 on 1 November 2005 during
the 42nd plenary session. What about all the other ‘genocides’ in history?
The Holocaust has become the central
issue of Judaism. It is to Judaism, as Christ is to
Christianity. It is forbidden to change
the sacred number of six million or cast any doubt on its principles, even
though scholarly research has declared it all null and void. To declare or compare any other people
suffering to the Jewish Holocaust is to invite the wrath of the Jewish
Gatekeepers. As an example, Alvin
Rosenfeld turns with outrage to Gentile writers who dare to pay sympathetic
attention to Jews and the Holocaust in an unacceptable manner, i.e., using
poetic license to appropriate Holocaust imagery and Jewish victimhood to
address (non-Jewish) personal suffering in their poems. Rosenfeld attacks the poet Sylvia Plath (ultimately
a suicide) for this crime. He quotes
this excerpt from one of her poems: “An
engine, an engine Chuffing me off like a Jew.
A Jew to Dachau, Auschwitz, Belsen.
I begin to talk like a Jew. I
think I may well be a Jew. The snows of
the Tyrol, the clear beer of Vienna Are not very pure or true. With my gypsy
ancestress and my weird luck And my Tarok pack and my Tarok pack I may be a bit
of a Jew.”
About half of the so-called neo-Nazi
or Anti-Semitic grafitti or harassment in the US turns out to be done by Jews.
European incidents are probably of the same percentage. Jewish ideology of ‘the Chosen People’, needs
fear to keep the tribe together. Many
Jewish groups are parasites living off of their own people demanding money
while creating fear. To stop
Anti-Semitism, Jews need to discard their Supremacist Ideology and to police
their own ranks for conspiracies against Gentiles.
Years of
resources have been used in this paper including dozens of mainstream journals
and magazines of the past. Several
internet sources have been used to supplement this Timeline including
mainstream Wikipedia and other sources.
Caution must be given to Wikipedia with its liberal Jewish bias. All information has also been easily discovered
on the Internet and larger library.
Given the cultural
background of Jews, their survivor testimonies and ‘histories’ are to be
immediately suspect. There are also
plenty of Gentiles to suspect.
**** These are several ‘contemporary’ Jew
Historians (from Wikipedia 2012), their tribal allegiances make
their objectivity suspect. Historians of
subjects before 1800 are left off: David Abulafia, British; Ignac Acsady,
Hungarian; Cyrus Adler, U.S. (Jewish); Geoffrey Alderman; Herbert Aptheker, Communist
Party; Yehoshua Arieli, Israeli; Walter Leonard Arnstein, U.S.; Raymond Aron, French
sociology; Robert Aron, French; Simon Ashkenazi, Polish; David Ayalon, Israeli Islam
and Judaism; Bernard Bailyn, U.S. Colonial; Richard Barnett, archaeologist; George
Louis Beer, U.S. 16th-19th commerce; Emile-Auguste Begin; Max Beloff, English; Joaquim
Bensaude Portuguese astronomy and navigation; Norman Bentwich, British; Israeli
Bercovici, Romanian; Jay R. Berkovitz, U.S. Jews in France; Harry Bernstein,
U.S.; Camille Bloch, French; Solomon Frank Bloom, U.S. Europe.; Jerome Blum,
U.S.; Daniel Boorstin, U.S.; Woodrow
Wilson Borah, U.S.; Ambrosio Brandao, Portuguese; Harry Bresslau, German; Berthold
Bretholz, Moravian; Jacob Bronowski, science; Robert Brunschvig, French Islam; Max
Buedinger, German; Achille Coen, Italian; David Cohen, Dutch; Michael Confino,
Israeli; Hermann Dessau, German; Isaac Deutscher, British Marxist; Max Dimont; Martin
Duberman, U.S.; Ariel Durant, (The Story of Civilization); Louis Eisenman,
French; Abraham Eisenstadt, U.S.; Amos Elon, Israeli; Louis Filler, U.S.;
Sidney Fine, U.S.; Samuel Finer, British; Robert Fogel, US; Heinrich Friedjung,
Moravian; Saul Friedländer, French-Israeli Holocaust; Peter Gay, US ideas; Leo
Gershoy, U.S.; Felix Gilbert, U.S.; Sir Martin Gilbert, British; Carlo
Ginzburg, Italian; Eric F. Goldman, U.S.; Yosef Goldman, US; Martin Goodman; Louis Reichenthal Gottschalk,
U.S.; Philip Guedalla; Elie Halevy, French (English 1915-30); George W. F.
Hallgarten; Theodore Stephen Hamerow, U.S.; Marceli Handelsman, Polish; Oscar
Handlin, U.S.; Henry Harrisse, U.S.; Ludo Moritz Hartmann, Austrian; Sigmund
Herzberg-Fraenkel, Austrian; Jack H. Hexter, U.S.; Uriel Heyd, Israeli (Islam);
Raul Hilberg, US (Holocaust); Gertrude Himmelfarb, (Victorian
Britain); Eric Hobsbawm, British Marxist; Richard Hofstadter, U.S.; Samuel
Justin Hurwitz, U.S.; Harold Melvin Hyman, U.S.; Siegfried Isaacsohn, German; Jonathan
Israel, British; Joseph Jacobs; Oscar
Isaiah Janowsky, U.S. (Europe and Jews); Lisa Jardine, British; Louis de Jong,
Dutch; Matthew Josephson, U.S.; Solomon Katz, U.S.; Elie Kedourie, British;
Morton Keller, U.S.; James Klugmann, communist; Richard Koebner, Israeli German;
Hans Kohn, U.S.; Michael Kraus, U.S.; Leonard Krieger, U.S.; Hyman Kublin, U.S.
(far east); Thomas Samuel Kuhn, U.S. (science); Otto Kurz; Gyula Lanczy,
Hungarian (economic); David Landes, U.S. (economic); Max Laserson, Latvian; Sir
Sidney Lee; Max Lerner, U.S.; Yitzchak Levine, columnist; Arthur Levy, French; Leonard
William Levy, U.S.; Paul Levy, French (linguistic); Bernard Lewis, British
orientalist; David Malcolm Lewis; Ephraim Lipson, British; Deborah Lipstadt, U.S. Holocaust; Victor Loewe, German; Sidney Low,
British; Samuel Lozinski, Russian; John Lukacs, Hungarian-US; Hyam Maccoby; Sir
Philip Magnus-Allcroft; Frank Manuel, U.S.; Henrik Marczali, Hungarian; Shula
Marks, South African-British (African); Ludwig Markus, German (Abyssinian and
Beta Israeli); Arno J. Mayer, US;
Gustav Mayer, German; Mark Borisovich Mitin, Russian; Arnaldo Momigliano,
Italian-British; Felice Momigliano, Italian; Richard Brandon Morris, U.S.;
Louis C. Morton, U.S.; George Mosse, US; Friederich Munzer, German classical;
Gustavus Myers, U.S.; Nadav Na`aman, Israeli (biblical times); Oskar Nachod,
German; Lewis Bernstein Namier, British; Alexander Nove; Michael Oren, Israeli;
Sir Francis Palgrave, British; Ilan
Pappé, Israeli; Martin Phillipson, German; Koppel S. Pinson, U.S.; Richard Pipes, US (Russia); Karl
Polanyi; Sidney Pomerantz, U.S.; Richard Popkin; Samuel A. Portnoy, US (Jewish
and East European); Sir Michael Postan, British; Joshua Prawer, Israeli (Jerusalem
and the crusades); Alfred Francis Pribram (de), Anglo-Austrian; Jacob Psantir,
Rumanian (Jews); Armin Rappaport, U.S.; Sidney Ratner, U.S.; Ludwig Riess,
German; Samuele Romanin, Italian (Judaism); Nello Roselli, Italian; Arthur
Rosenberg, German (Zionist); Cecil Roth,
British; Julius Salomon, Danish; Simon Schama, British; J. Salwyn Schapiro, US;
Leonard Schapiro; David Schoenbaum; Moses Schorr, (Polish Jews); Debra Schultz,
US (feminist); Yossi Schwartz (Jews); Hugh Sebag-Montefiore, British WW2; Simon
Sebag Montefiore, British (Russia); Tom Segev, Israeli; Arturo Segre, Italian; Avraham
Sela, Israeli; Enrique Semo, Mexican; Bernard Semmel, U.S; Michael Shamah,
British; Moshe Shamir, Israeli; Leeor Shimron, US; Avi Shlaim, Israeli: Joseph
Shulim, U.S.; Paul Simson, German; Charles Singer, British; Louis Snyder, U.S.;
Sir Aurel Stein, archeologist; Henri Stein, French; Alfred Stern, Swiss; Barry
Supple, British; Jacob Talmon, Israeli; Frank Tannenbaum, U.S.; Rosa Levin
Toubin, Jewish Texan; Hans Trefousse, U.S.; Barbara Tuchman, U.S.; Irwin Unger, U.S.; Geza Vermes, British;
Bernard Weisberger, U.S.; Eduard Wertheimer, Hungarian; Helene Wieruszowski, U.S.;
Bertram Wolfe, U.S. Soviet; Leonard Woolf, British; Oscar Zeichner, U.S.;
Alfred Zimmern, British; Carl A. Zimring, US; Howard Zinn, US.
****Historiography
of Nazi Germany:
These are several of
the Historians in this Thesis whom have written about Nazi Germany: (Should there not be suspicions toward
a Jew’s scholarship for his subjectiveness toward his Tribe? Many of these books do not use original
material, but reference oral testimonies which may become more subjective and
less factual through their retelling.
There are a few Jews listed here who escaped from German prison camps.
How can that be?)
WARNING Jew Holocaust
Court Historians
Jews: Yitzhak Arad (2007); "Hannah" Arendt (1963); Ivo Banac (1984);
Yehuda Bauer (1977); Zygmunt Bauman(1957); Michael Berenbaum (1979); Donald
Bloxham (2001); Randolph L. Braham (1963); Richard Breitman(1991); Alan Bullock
(Jew?)(1952); Barbara S. Burstin (2012); David Cesarani (1992); Richard I.
(Yerachmiel) Cohen (1968); Shamai Davidson (1979); Lucy Dawidowicz(1975); Debórah
Dwork (1991); David Engel (1987); Andrew (Andrievs) Ezergailis (1983); Emil Fackenheim
(1960); Henry Friedlander (1989); Saul Friedländer(1966); Tuvia Friling (2004);
Robert Gerwarth (2005); Martin Gilbert (1979); Daniel Goldhagen(1996); Ivo
Goldstein (2001); Slavko Goldstein (2001); Gideon Greif (1983); Israel Gutman
(1961); Abel J Herzberg (1989); Raul Hilberg(1961); Andreas Hillgruber(1954);
Hajo Holborn (wife is Jew)(1956); Dovid Katz (2008); Jacob Katz (1950); Steven
T. Katz (1975); Simon Kitson
(Jew?)(1995); David Kranzler (1987); Claude Lanzmann (1985); Nora Levin (1989);
Deborah Lipstadt (1986); Peter Longerich (Jew?)(2003); Richard Löwenthal(1964);
Yaacov Lozowick (2002); Thomas Lutz (2012); Lothar Machtan(2001); Rachel
Margolis (2008); Michael Marrus (1977); Rafael Medoff (1987); Friedrich
Meinecke(1946); George Mosse(1965); Lewis Namier (1952); Stephen H. Norwood
(2009); Peter Novick (1988); Janusz Piekałkiewicz(?)(1973); Franciszek Piper
(1991); Richard Plant (1986); Antony Polonsky (1972); Terrence Des Pres (1976);
(Jacob) Presser (1965); Eva Reichmann(1945); Mark Roseman (2001); Hans
Rothfels(1948); Jules Schelvis (2012); Hans Schoeps 2012; Lawrence
Shirer (1960); Gerald Steinacher (2009); Fritz Stern (1963); Kenneth S. Stern (1993);
Nechama Tec (1986); Vladimir Tismăneanu (2006); Enzo Traverso (1999); Pierre
Vidal-Naquet (1995); "Kenny" Waltzer (2012); Gerhard Weinberg 1985; Jankiel
Wiernik (1972); Gabriel Wilensky (2010); David S. Wyman
(1968); Hanna Yablonka (1999); Susan S Zuccotti (1987); Ingo Zechner (2000); Sara
Plager-Zyskind (1981;
Of course some Jews are fair and many
Gentiles try to stretch the Court History into forms of Truth.
Unfortunately, many Gentile Holocaust Court Historians… (How many cryptoJews?)
Non-Jews: David Blackbourn (1980); Karl Bracher; Martin Broszat(1966); Christopher
Browning(1992); Gordon Craig(1996); Norman Davies(1986); Geoffrey Eley (1984); Robert
Ericksen (1985); Richard Evans(1976); Michael F. Feldkamp (2000); Joachim
Fest(1994); Fritz Fischer (1961); Norman J. W. Goda (1998); David P. Gushee
(2008); Michael Hagemeister(2006); Brigitte Hamann(1999); Ulrich Herbert(1997);
Klaus Hildebrand(1969); Joachim Hoffmann(1996); Heinz Höhne(1967); Eberhard
Jäckel(1966); Klas-Göran Karlsson (2012); Michael Kater(1966); Ian
Kershaw(1985); Eberhard Kolb(1984); Franklin Littell (1976); Timothy
Mason(1975); Hans Mommsen(1979); Wolfgang Mommsen(1959); Arthur D. Morse
(1968); Sönke Neitzel(2007); Heinz Neumeyer (1953); Thomas Nipperdey(1983);
Jeremy Noakes 2001; (Steve) Paulsson (2000); Robert Jan van Pelt(2005); Edward
N. Peterson(1954); Detlev Peukert(1990); Léon Poliakov (1956); Jean-Claude
Pressac (1988); Gerhard Albert Ritter(1991); Gerhard G B Ritter(1967); Jürgen
Rohwer (1960); Ronald J. Rychlak (2000);Theodor Schieder(1984); Walter
Schlesinger(1984); Claudia Schoppmann(1991); Percy Schramm (1962); Hagen
Schulze(1996); Hans-Günther Seraphim(1949); Hasso Spode(1985); Michael
Stürmer(1986); Jochen Thies(1976); Douglas F. Tobler (1998); Henry Ashby
Turner, Jr. (1985); Hannah Vogt(1961); Hans-Ulrich Wehler (leftist)(1969);
Heinrich Winkler(1976); Robert Wolfe (1975); Michael Zimmerman(1996); Rainer
Zitelmann(2000);
****Sonderweg ("special path") is a controversial theory in German
historiography that considers the German-speaking lands, or the country
Germany, to have followed a unique course
from aristocracy to democracy, distinct from other European countries. It is also used to explain German foreign
policy and ideology before and during WW I, which was characterized by trying
to find a "Third Way" to be implemented for the world, other than western "vulgar"
democracy or eastern Czaristic autocracy.
This theory has progressively gained a following since the late 1960s. In particular, its proponents argue that the
way Germany developed over the centuries virtually ensured the evolution of a
social and political order along the lines of Nazi Germany. In their view, German mentalities, the
structure of society, and institutional developments followed a different
course in comparison with the other nations of the West, which had a "normal"
development of their histories.
The term Sonderweg was first used by
German conservatives in the Imperial period, starting in the late 19th century
as a source of pride at the "Golden Mean" of governance that in their view had been attained
by the German state, whose distinctiveness as an authoritarian state lay in
taking the initiative in instituting social reforms, imposing them without
waiting to be pressured by demands "from below". This type of authoritarianism was seen
avoiding both the autocracy of Imperial Russia and what they regarded as the
weak, decadent and ineffective democratic governments of Britain and France. The idea of Germany as a great Central
European power, neither of the West nor
of the East was to be a recurring feature of right-wing German thought
right up to 1945.
Historian Hans-Ulrich Wehler of the Bielefeld
School places the origins of Germany's path to disaster in the 1860s-1870s,
when economic modernization took place, but political modernization did not
happen and the old Prussian rural elite remained in firm control of the army,
diplomacy and the civil service. Traditional,
aristocratic, premodern society battled an emerging capitalist, bourgeois,
modernizing society. Recognizing the importance of modernizing forces in
industry and the economy and in the cultural realm, Wehler argues that
reactionary traditionalism dominated the political hierarchy of power in
Germany, as well as social mentalities and in class relations.
The story of Nazi
Germany's occupation of Czechoslovakia in March 1939 and its invasion of Poland
in September 1939 provoked the drive to explain the phenomenon of Nazi Germany.
In 1940, Judeophile Sebastian Haffner, a German émigré living in Britain,
published Germany: Jekyll and Hyde, in which he argued it was Adolf Hitler
alone, by the force of his peculiar personality, who had brought about Nazi
Germany. In 1941, the British diplomat Robert
Vansittart published “The Black
Record: Germans Past And Present”, according to which Nazism was only the
latest manifestation of what Vansittart argued were the exclusively German
traits of aggressiveness and brutality. Other
books with a thesis similar to Vansittart's were Rohan O'Butler's “The Roots of National Socialism” (1941) and William Montgomery McGovern's “From Luther
to Hitler: The History of Nazi-Fascist Philosophy” (1946).
After Germany's defeat in World War II
in 1945, the term Sonderweg lost its positive connotations from the 19th
century and acquired its present negative meaning. There was much debate about the origins of
this "German catastrophe" (as the German historian Meinecke titled his 1946 book) of Nazi
Germany's rise and fall. Until the
mid-1960s, the Sonderweg debate was polarized with most non-German participants
at one pole and German participants at the other. Historians like Léon Poliakov, A. J. P. Taylor, and (Jew) Sir Lewis Bernstein Namier,
echoed by journalists like the American Jew
William L. Shirer, portrayed Nazism
as the inevitable result of German history, reflecting unique flaws in
"German national character" that went back to the days of Martin
Luther, if not earlier.
In contrast,
German historians such as Jew Friedrich
Meinecke, Jew Hans Rothfels, and Gerhard Ritter, joined by a few non-German
historians such as Pieter Geyl,
contended that the Nazi period had no relationship to earlier periods of German
history, and that German traditions were at sharp variance with the
totalitarianism of the Nazi movement. Meinecke
famously described National Socialism in his 1946 book ("The German
Catastrophe") as a particularly unfortunate ("on-the-job
accident") of history. They have
been joined by their intellectual heirs Klaus
Hildebrand, Karl Dietrich Bracher, and Henry Ashby Turner in contending
that though the Nazi dictatorship was rooted in the German past, it was
individual choices made during the later Weimar years that led to the Nazi
years.
Starting in
the 1960s, historians such as Fritz
Fischer and Hans-Ulrich Wehler argued that, unlike France and Britain,
Germany had experienced only "partial modernization", in which
industrialization was not followed by changes in the political and social
spheres. The crucial turning point was
the Revolution of 1848, when German liberals failed to seize power and
consequently either emigrated or chose to resign themselves to being ruled by a
reactionary elite, living in a society that taught its children obedience,
glorification of militarism, and pride in a very complex notion of German culture.
Another
version of the Sonderweg thesis emerged in the US in the 1950s-1960s, when
historians such as Fritz Stern and
George Mosse examined the anti-Semitic völkisch movement. Christopher
Browning in “Ordinary Men” (1992) opposed the theory of anti-Semitic
Germans and concluded that these typical middle class workers were not
ingrained with anti-Semitism, but rather became killers through peer pressure
and indoctrination. Jew Daniel Goldhagen in
“Hitler's Willing Executioners” (1996) countered that German society, politics,
and life up until 1945 were characterized by a unique version of extreme
anti-Semitism that held the murder of Jews as the highest possible national
value.
Michael Stürmer contends that Germany’s precarious
geographical situation in the heart of Central Europe left successive German
governments no other choice but to engage in authoritarianism.
The leading critics of the Sonderweg thesis
have been two British Marxist
historians, Geoff Eley and David Blackbourn, who in their 1984 book The Peculiarities
of German History argued that there is no "normal" course of social
and political change; that the experience of France and Britain in the 19th
century was not the norm for Europe; and that even if the liberal German middle
class was disempowered at the national political level, it nevertheless
dominated the social, economic and cultural life of 19th century Germany. This embourgeoisement of German social life
was greater than in Britain and France, which was more distinctly marked by
aristocratic values than was Germany. There
was no Sonderweg, and it is ahistorical to judge why Germany did not become
Britain for the simple reason that Germany is Germany and Britain is Britain. Moreover, after 1890 there was a tendency
towards greater democratization in German society with the growth of civil
society as reflected in the growth of trade unions and a more or less free
press.
(Frank?) Schubert states that the history of the Holy
Roman Empire is not to be confused with the Sonderweg, which can only be seen
as a result of the concept of German identity, developing in the Romanticism of
the late 18th century, reinforced by the Napoleonic Wars in which Germany was
under French occupation. Previous
events, especially not those of the Holy Roman Empire, cannot be related to the
evolution of Nazism.
(This author agrees with Sonderweg,
every country is unique. I would agree
that Germany’s central location and its less materialist stance because of a
deeper Christianity would make it unique.)
****The
Historikerstreit
("historians' quarrel")
was an intellectual and political controversy during 1986-1989 in West Germany
about the crimes of Nazi Germany, including their comparability with the crimes
of the Soviet Union. The positions taken
by the right-wing intellectuals were largely based on the totalitarianism
approach which takes a comparative approach to totalitarian states, while
left-wing intellectuals argued that fascism was uniquely evil, referred to as
the Sonderweg approach, and could not be compared to the crimes of Soviet
communism. The first were accused by
their critics of downplaying Nazi crimes, while the latter were accused by
their critics of downplaying Soviet crimes. In most of Eastern and Central Europe, a
comparative approach to Soviet and Nazi crimes is the mainstream scholarly and
official position taken. In the western
world, the debate revolving around issues similar to those of the
Historikerstreit was renewed following the publication of The Black Book of
Communism in 1997. The British historian
Norman Davies argued in 2006 that
revelations made after the Fall of Communism in Eastern Europe after 1989-91
about Soviet crimes had discredited the left-wing position in the
Historikerstreit debate.
(This author would not even agree that the Nazi government
was evil. Its government was thankfully
trying to present a Christian society for its People. Practically all of the other competitors of
Hitler were authoritarian in nature.)
Two of the
more debated questions were whether Nazism was in some way part of the “German
national character”, and how much responsibility, if any, the German people
bore for the crimes of Nazism. Non-German
historians A. J. P. Taylor and Sir Lewis
Namier, argued that the vast majority of Germans were responsible for Nazi
crimes. Liberals emphasized Hitler's personal
role and responsibility. Within West
Germany then, most historians were strongly defensive. In the assessment of Gerhard Ritter and
others, Nazism was a totalitarian movement that represented only the work of a
small criminal clique; Germans were victims of Nazism, and the Nazi era
represented a total break in German history.
Starting in the 1960s, that assessment was challenged by younger German
historians. Fritz Fischer argued in
favor of a Sonderweg conception of German history that saw Nazism as the
inevitable result of the way German society had developed. Functionalists cast
blame for the Holocaust across society. Many right-wing German historians disliked
the implications of the Sonderweg conception and the functionalist school. (They disliked
this because it was connected with EVIL CRIMES.
If no real crimes, as the Truth holds, they would have accepted it.) By the mid-1980s, right-wing German historians
began to think it was time for the nation to start celebrating much of its
history again. Two proposed museums
celebrating modern German history were to be built in West Berlin and Bonn.
The debate
opened in 1986 when Ernst Nolte wrote
(“The past that won't go away”). Nolte
argued that the “race murder” of the Nazi death camps was a “defensive
reaction” to the “class murder” of the Stalinist system of gulags. In his view, the gulags were the original and
greater horror. In the face of the
threat of Bolshevism, it was reasonable that the German people would turn to
Nazi fascism. Jürgen Habermas complained that historians such as Michael Stürmer and Andreas Hillgruber
were seeking to whitewash the German past, and uniquely German aspects of the
Holocaust. In Hillgruber's 1986 book
Zweierlei Untergang (“Two kinds of downfall: the smashing of the German Reich and
the end of European Jewry”), he lamented the mass expulsions of ethnic Germans
from Czechoslovakia and Poland at the end of World War II and compared the
sufferings of the Heimatvertriebene (“those expelled from their native land”)
to that of victims of the Holocaust. Hillgruber
had not supported Nolte, but the controversy over Zweierlei Untergang became
linked with Nolte's views when Habermas and Wehler characterized both men as
conservatives trying to minimize Nazi crimes.
The debate
centered on four main questions: 1)Were the crimes of Nazi Germany uniquely
evil in history, or were other crimes, such as those of Joseph Stalin in the
Soviet Union, comparably evil? 2)Did
German history follow a "special path" (the above mentioned
Sonderweg) leading inevitably to Nazism? (The West German historians Klaus
Hildebrand, Gerhard Ritter, and Andreas Hillgruber rejected the Sonderweg view,
while the British historian A. J. P.
Taylor and the West German historians Hans-Ulrich
Wehler, Wolfgang Mommsen, Hans Mommsen and Fritz Fischer supported it. A sub-issue of the Sonderweg thesis concerned
the reasons for the alleged Sonderweg. Stürmer argued for geographical factors
as the reason for the Sonderweg while Wehler insisted on cultural and social
factors.) 3)Were other genocides comparable
to the Holocaust? 4)Were the crimes of
the Nazis a reaction to Soviet crimes under Stalin, as Nolte contended? Should
the German people bear a special burden of guilt for Nazi crimes, or could new
generations of Germans find sources of pride in their history?
On one side
of the argument were the philosopher Jürgen
Habermas, and the historians Hans-Ulrich
Wehler, Jürgen Kocka, Hans Mommsen, Martin Broszat, Heinrich August Winkler,
Eberhard Jäckel, and Wolfgang Mommsen. On the other (better) side were the
philosopher Ernst Nolte, the
journalist Joachim Fest, and the
historians Andreas Hillgruber, Klaus
Hildebrand, Rainer Zitelmann, Hagen Schulze, and Michael Stürmer. Karl
Dietrich Bracher and Richard Löwenthal argued for some compromise; they
said that comparing different totalitarian systems was a valid intellectual
exercise, but insisted that the Holocaust should not be compared to other
genocides. A few foreign historians also
contributed to the debate. The British historians Richard J. Evans and Ian Kershaw sided with the Sonderweg position.
The American historian Gordon A. Craig was highly critical of
the views of Nolte, but generally defended Hillgruber.
****Guilt
Everywhere- "struggle to come to terms with
the past": Vergangenheitsbewältigung
is a composite German word that describes processes of dealing with the past
(Vergangenheit = past; Bewältigung = coming to terms with, mastering), which is
perhaps best rendered in English as "struggle to come to terms with the
past". The German term Geschichtsaufarbeitung (lit.
"processing of history") describes similar processes, but is less
common. IT describes the attempt to analyze, digest and learn to live with
the past, in particular the Holocaust. The
term deals at once with the concrete responsibility of the German state (West
Germany assumed the legal obligations of the Reich) and of individual Germans
for what took place "under Hitler," and with questions about the
roots of legitimacy of German society. More
recently, the IT has also been used
in the former East Germany to refer to the process of working through the
brutalities of Communist institutions. IT often is seen as the logical
"next step," after a denazification driven at first under Allied
Occupation and then by the Christian Democratic Union government of Konrad
Adenauer. It dates from the late 1950s
and early 1960s, roughly the period in which the work of the (reconstruction)
became less absorbing and urgent. Having
replaced the institutions and power structures of Nazism, the aim of liberal
Germans was to deal with the guilt of recent history.
The German churches
have developed a specifically German post-war theology of repentance. At the regular mass church rallies, this theme
is developed as a leitmotiv of Christian youth. The main institutionally driven sphere of IT is in the schools, where in most German states the centrally-written curriculum subjects every child to
repeated lessons on different aspects of Nazism in German, history, politics
and religion classes from the fifth grade onwards. Typically there are school trips to concentration camps, and Jewish
Holocaust survivors are often invited to schools as guest speakers, though
the passage of time limits these opportunities.
In the cultural sphere, IT
arises in German literature,
characterized by such authors as Günter
Grass and Siegfried Lenz. Lenz's novel Deutschstunde and Grass's Danziger
Trilogie both deal with childhood under Nazism, and are a good starting point
for this literature. The erection of public monuments to Holocaust
victims has been a particular theme in Germany's Vergangenheitsbewältigung.
Concentration camps such as Dachau, Buchenwald, Bergen-Belsen and Flossenbürg
are open to visitors as memorials and museums. Most towns have plaques on walls
marking the spots where particular atrocities took place.
(Enough guilt, the Allied Court
Historians are still in charge.)
****Continentalists vs. Globalists: The foreign
policy and war aims of the Nazis have been the subject of debate among
historians. There has been disagreement
over whether Adolf Hitler, their leader, aimed solely at European expansion and
domination, or whether he planned, in the long-term, for a global empire.
(Wikipedia wording) This argument originates
from the 1960s by Continentalists Gunter
Moltmann and Andreas Hillgruber who claim that it was Hitler’s dream to
create ‘Eutopia’. Globalists claim the evidence of Germany’s preparation for war in
the years 1933-39 with increased interest in naval building, and Hitler’s
decision to declare war on the USA after the attack on Pearl Harbor, which
shows Hitler’s determination. Continentalist Hildebrand believed
Hitler had a carefully premeditated (step-by-step) for Lebensraum. Globalist
Hillgruber claims he intended intercontinental conquest afterwards. Globalist
Jeremy Noakes and Globalist Geoffrey
Pridham believe that taking Mein Kampf and the Zweites Buch together,
Hitler had a five stage plan; 1)rearmament and Rhineland re-militarization, 2)Austria,
Czech and Poland to become German satellites, 3)defeat France or neutralize her
through a British alliance, 4)Lebensraum in Russia and finally 5)world
domination. Globalist Norman J. W. Goda
agrees, believing that his ultimate aim was the defeat and overthrow of the US,
against whose threat he would guarantee the British Empire in return for a free
hand to pursue Lebensraum in the East. Hitler
had long term plans for French North Africa and in 1941 begun to prepare a base
for a transatlantic attack on the United States. Globalist
David Cameron Watt, who in 1990 believed that Hitler had no long terms
plans, now agrees with Goda and believes that Hitler refused to make
concessions to Spanish and Italian leaders Francisco Franco and Benito
Mussolini in order to conciliate a defeated France so that such preparations
could proceed. Globalist Jochen Thies has been noted to say that plans for world
domination can be seen in Hitler's ideology of displaying power. The creation
of magnificent buildings and the use of propaganda to demonstrate German
strength, along with the message to create a Reich to last a thousand years,
clearly show Hitler's aspirations for the future. Continentalist
Fritz Fischer claims that Hitler wanted an empire to protect German
interests at a time of economic instability and pressure from competing Global
empires. Continentalist Martin Broszat offers a case in declaring that
Hitler was still dreaming of Eutopia when he did not include Poland in his
plans before 1939, and focused upon Czechoslovakia and Austria instead; easily
attainable territories. In 1961, A. J. P. Taylor wrote Origins of the
Second World War describes Hitler as a normal German leader and an opportunist
in foreign policy, which created the whole argument on the nature of Nazi
foreign policy.
(This author would disagree with both
sides, as Hitler only wanted German unity and Peace and Economic alliances, not
political hegemony.)
****Functionalism
(or structuralism) versus Intentionalism is a debate about the origins of the Holocaust as well
as most aspects of the Third Reich, such as foreign policy. The debate on the origins of the Holocaust
centers on essentially two questions:
Was there a master plan on the part of Adolf Hitler to launch the
Holocaust? Intentionalists argue there
was such a plan, while functionalists argue there was not. Did the initiative for the Holocaust come
from above with orders from Adolf Hitler or from below within the ranks of the
German bureaucracy? Intentionalists
argue the initiative came from above, while functionalists contend it came from
lower ranks within the bureaucracy.
The terms
were coined in a 1981 essay by the British Marxist historian Timothy
Mason. Notable functionalists have
included Jew Raul Hilberg, dupe Christopher Browning, leftist Hans Mommsen, Jew
Martin Broszat, and Jew Zygmunt Bauman.
Notable intentionalists have included Jew Andreas Hillgruber, dupe
German Karl Dietrich Bracher, dupe German Klaus Hildebrand, dupe German
Eberhard Jäckel, Jew (?) Richard Breitman, and Jew Lucy Dawidowicz. Neither side disputes the reality of the
Holocaust.
Of course, there was no Holocaust as presented. The Germans are noted for being meticulous
record keepers. There were no written orders from Hitler or anyone to approve
of the killing of Jews. There were also no
proof of gas chambers, etc. This is a
debate among Holocaust promoters not real historians.
(This author would not accept either
of these stances since the Holocaust described by Court Historians did not
occur!)
**There is Hope: Even though the Press continues to purposely mislead with the use of
deliberate mistranslations throughout the years of diverse nations such as
Germany and Iran, with the use of “Extermination” and such, the nation of
Israel and the Talmudic religion of Judaism may become extinct someday. The hope of assimilation and the loss of
cohesion for Zionism and Talmudism will rid the world of these menaces. Yet the elite will continue to build its
wealth a weave their webs of control over humanity. This is a battle that must not end with the
defeat of Judaic superiority. This is
still a battle of Jewish materialism versus Christian humanism.
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________
As disclosure
and understanding of the author of this timeline, he is a regular Joe, 58 yrs
old, half white collar with two Masters, one in the Ministry and another in
Counseling and half blue collar with half his life in labor jobs. He was Raised Northern Baptist with a light
dose of Zionism. An initial eye-opening
came when a university professor suggested that we should have let Patton
finish the job with Moscow. Another was
from a German violin maker who had been in the wartime German army, but was not
a Nazi. He has been interested in these
subjects for 30 years.